Current:Home > reviewsPennsylvania House Dems propose new expulsion rules after remote voting by lawmaker facing a warrant -Elevate Profit Vision
Pennsylvania House Dems propose new expulsion rules after remote voting by lawmaker facing a warrant
View
Date:2025-04-13 18:14:42
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Pennsylvania House Democrats on Thursday proposed a process to determine if state representatives are “incapacitated” and to sanction or expel them, moving in the wake of intense criticism after one of their members voted remotely this week while being sought on charges he violated a restraining order.
The resolution introduced by Majority Leader Matt Bradford of Montgomery County would establish a new group consisting of five House leaders to determine if a representative is impaired physically or mentally so that they are not able to perform their duties.
His proposed rules change is a response to voting during this week’s legislative session by state Rep. Kevin Boyle, a Philadelphia Democrat who faces an arrest warrant on allegations he violated a restraining order. Details about the warrant have not been released, and Boyle has not responded to phone messages seeking comment left Thursday and earlier this week.
A Philadelphia Police spokeswoman, Officer Tanya Little, said Thursday afternoon Boyle is not in custody.
Boyle lost his committee chairmanship and Capitol access privileges in February after a videotaped episode at a Montgomery County bar where he was aggressively rude to the staff and appeared intoxicated.
Boyle’s status carries significant implications for the power balance in the 203-member House, currently with a 102—100 Democratic majority and a special election next week for the vacancy, a Republican-leaning district in the Pocono Mountains.
Republican leaders have decried Boyle’s ability to vote remotely, telling reporters Wednesday that House Democrats should have simply put Boyle on leave and accusing their Democratic counterparts of allowing Boyle to vote remotely to preserve their thin majority.
Minority Leader Bryan Cutler, a Lancaster County Republican, called Bradford’s proposal a complicated answer to a simple problem. He asked Democrats to stop Boyle from voting “until this issue is finally resolved.”
“Pennsylvania House Democrats continue to use this tragedy to further the tyranny of their majority and that is shameful,” Cutler said in a statement. The House returns to session April 29.
A Republican from Fayette County, Rep. Charity Grimm Krupa, announced on Wednesday she was working on a proposal to change House rules to prevent anyone from voting remotely if they are incarcerated or facing an active arrest warrant. And the only Republican in the House from Philadelphia, Rep. Martina White, said her office has been fielding calls from Boyle’s constituents because his nearby district office hasn’t been responding.
Boyle, 44, is currently facing a primary opponent as he seeks an eighth term in the House. His brother is U.S. Rep. Brendan Boyle, a Democrat from a Philadelphia district.
Kevin Boyle was charged three years ago with harassment and violation of a protection from abuse order after showing up at his wife’s house, charges that were subsequently dropped. His attorney at the time described it as a “domestic issue” that did not involve allegations of violence. Kevin Boyle later said he was treated at a mental health facility.
Bradford’s proposal would allow targeted lawmakers to participate, with a lawyer, in the inquiry that would be done by the speaker, minority and majority leaders, and minority and majority caucus chairpersons. The group would meet in secret and could direct that the lawmaker whose status is in question be examined by doctors or psychologists. It would have subpoena power.
If the group would deem a House member to be incapacitated and unable to perform their duties, it would be up to a vote of the full House to decide whether to limit their powers and privileges, suspend them without pay or expel them. If the lawmaker hasn’t been expelled and has completed treatment, they could ask to get their powers or status back.
veryGood! (66146)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Empty vehicle on tracks derails Chicago-bound Amtrak train in Michigan
- You can watch 'A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving' for free this weekend. Here's how.
- Unions, Detroit casinos reach deal that could end strike
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Years after strike, West Virginia public workers push back against another insurance cost increase
- The U.S. has special rules for satellites over one country: Israel
- Empty vehicle on tracks derails Chicago-bound Amtrak train in Michigan
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- The harrowing Ukraine war doc ’20 Days in Mariupol’ is coming to TV. Here’s how to watch
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Bengals believe QB Joe Burrow sprained his wrist in loss to Ravens
- IBM pulls ads from Elon Musk’s X after report says they appeared next to antisemitic posts
- K-Pop star Rose joins first lady Jill Biden to talk mental health
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Why Sharon Osbourne Cautions Against Ozempic Use After Dropping to Under 100 Lbs.
- New Jersey to allow beer, wine deliveries by third parties
- Spain’s Pedro Sánchez beat the odds to stay prime minister. Now he must keep his government in power
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
STAYC reflects on first US tour, sonic identity and being a 'comfort' to SWITH
Citing ongoing criminal case, UVA further delays release of campus shooting findings
More than 240 Rohingya refugees afloat off Indonesia after they are twice refused by residents
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Officer fires gun in Atlanta hospital while pursuing vehicle theft suspect
Judge denies Trump’s request for a mistrial in his New York civil fraud case
Judge finds Voting Rights Act violation in North Dakota redistricting for two tribes