Current:Home > reviewsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Elevate Profit Vision
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
EchoSense View
Date:2025-04-11 10:50:14
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (281)
Related
- 'Most Whopper
- 11,000 runners disqualified from Mexico City Marathon for cheating
- How Pippa Middleton and James Matthews Built Their Impressive Billion-Dollar Empire
- The Lions might actually be ... good? Soaring hype puts Detroit in rare territory.
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Jonathan Majors' domestic violence trial delayed again in alleged assault case
- New Jersey gets $425M in federal transit funds for train and bus projects
- North Carolina public school students performing better on standardized tests, report says
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Jenni Hermoso accuses Luis Rubiales of sexual assault for World Cup kiss
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- E. Jean Carroll wins partial summary judgment in 2019 defamation case against Trump
- Shake Shack launches new 'Hot Menu' featuring hot chicken sandwich, spicy burger
- Scarred by two years of high inflation, this is how many Americans are surviving
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Hit in DNA database exonerates man 47 years after wrongful rape conviction
- Mexico’s Supreme Court decriminalizes abortion nationwide
- For The Eras Tour, Taylor Swift takes a lucrative, satisfying victory lap
Recommendation
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Bruce Springsteen postpones September shows, citing doctor’s advice regarding ulcer treatment
Georgia father arrested in 7-year-old son's death after leaving boy in car with brother
NFL power rankings: Which teams are looking good entering Week 1?
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
BTS star Jung Kook added to Global Citizen lineup in New York: 'The festival drives action'
Suspect sought after multiple Michigan State Police patrol vehicles are shot and set on fire
F1 driver Carlos Sainz chases down alleged thieves who stole his $500,000 watch