Current:Home > MyJudge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds -Elevate Profit Vision
Judge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds
View
Date:2025-04-18 11:29:56
A Georgia judge on Thursday denied an effort by former President Donald Trump and 14 others to dismiss the 2020 election-related case in Fulton County, ruling that the First Amendment does not protect the defendants from prosecution.
In a 14-page order, Judge Scott McAfee rejected the argument put forth by the defendants that the charges violate the First Amendment's protections of political speech and the right to petition Congress.
"[F]ree speech — including political speech — is not without restriction," McAfee wrote. "These excluded categories include speech integral to criminal conduct, fraud, or speech presenting an imminent threat that the Government can prevent."
Trump and 18 other co-defendants were indicted last year on state charges by a grand jury in Fulton County, the culmination of an investigation by District Attorney Fani Willis and her office. Prosecutors alleged the defendants worked to overturn the election results in Georgia after Trump lost the state in 2020. Trump and most of the other defendants have pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing, while several others have taken plea deals.
The former president faces 10 felony charges. McAfee dismissed three against him in an earlier decision.
Defense attorneys challenged the state laws underpinning the charges, saying the alleged violations were protected political speech. McAfee ruled that the First Amendment's protections do not apply, since the speech in question is "alleged to have been made in furtherance of criminal activity."
"Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity," the judge wrote.
Steve Sadow, an attorney for Trump, said the defendants "respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee's order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges." Sadow noted that McAfee left the door open for the defendants to raise the First Amendment issue further down the line.
In his order, McAfee said only a jury can resolve whether Trump and his allies' speech or conduct "was carried out with criminal intent," as prosecutors have claimed.
Still, he added that "accepting the allegations as true for the purposes of this pretrial challenge, as the court must, the speech alleged in this indictment is integral to criminal conduct and categorically excluded from First Amendment protections."
McAfee said defense attorneys have not presented "any authority that the speech and conduct alleged" is constitutionally protected political speech.
The sprawling racketeering case brought by Willis and her office has picked back up after an effort spearheaded by one of Trump's co-defendants to disqualify the district attorney from the prosecution derailed it for several weeks.
Michael Roman, a longtime GOP operative, accused Willis of engaging in an improper romantic relationship with one of her deputies, Nathan Wade, and alleged she financially benefited from it. Trump and seven others joined Roman's bid to remove Willis and the district attorney's office from the case, but McAfee ultimately declined to do so.
The judge instead said Willis could remain on the case so long as Wade resigned, which he did on the heels of McAfee's decision.
Willis and Wade acknowledged they were romantically involved, but said their relationship began after Wade was hired in November 2021 to work on the case involving Trump. They both forcefully denied wrongdoing, but the allegations cast a shadow over the prosecution.
The former president and the seven co-defendants asked the Georgia Court of Appeals last week to review McAfee's decision not to disqualify Willis and her office. The court has 45 days to decide whether to hear the appeal.
The Georgia case is one of four criminal prosecutions brought against the former president. A trial in Manhattan, where Trump faces 34 felony counts for falsifying business records, is set to begin this month.
His conduct surrounding the 2020 election also led to federal charges in Washington, D.C., brought by special counsel Jack Smith. The fourth prosecution, also brought by Smith in federal court in South Florida, stems from Trump's alleged mishandling of sensitive government documents after he left the White House in January 2021.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges and has claimed that the prosecutions are politically motivated.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (8739)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Chicago police officer shot in hand, sustains non-life-threatening injury
- South Korean court overturns impeachment of government minister ousted over deadly crowd crush
- Kendall Jenner Rules the Runway in White-Hot Pantsless Look
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Silicon Valley Bank's three fatal flaws
- A Climate Progressive Leads a Crowded Democratic Field for Pittsburgh’s 12th Congressional District Seat
- Novo Nordisk will cut some U.S. insulin prices by up to 75% starting next year
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Inside Clean Energy: Which State Will Be the First to Ban Natural Gas in New Buildings?
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- IRS whistleblower in Hunter Biden case says he felt handcuffed during 5-year investigation
- What to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse, takeover and fallout
- California Gears Up for a New Composting Law to Cut Methane Emissions and Enrich Soil
- Bodycam footage shows high
- It's Equal Pay Day. The gender pay gap has hardly budged in 20 years. What gives?
- Mega Millions jackpot jumps to $720 million after no winners in Tuesday's drawing
- ‘Reduced Risk’ Pesticides Are Widespread in California Streams
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Save 48% on a Ninja Foodi XL 10-In-1 Air Fry Smart Oven That Does the Work of Several Appliances
Chicago police officer shot in hand, sustains non-life-threatening injury
After 2 banks collapsed, Sen. Warren blames the loosening of restrictions
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Mega Millions jackpot jumps to $720 million after no winners in Tuesday's drawing
Margot Robbie's Barbie-Inspired Look Will Make You Do a Double Take
The Greek Island Where Renewable Energy and Hybrid Cars Rule